Results for “caudal”
Type a name: scientific, common, or one a species used to go by. Or narrow the catalogue with the filters.
Filters

Garra salweenica
Hora & Mukerji, 1934
Max length175mm SL7in SLTanknot recordedTempnot recordedpHnot recordedG. salweenica can be distinguished from other congeners inhabiting the Salween watershed by the following combinatuion of characters: body brownish; presence of a trilobed proboscis on the snout; snout blunt; a series of black spots at the base of the central dorsal-fin rays; presence of longitudinal stripes on the posterior portion of the body; a dark marking at the tip of the upper (and lower in some specimens) caudal-fin lobe; body depth 22.4-25.3 % SL.

Gastromyzon ocellatus
Tan & Ng, 2004
Max length45mm SL1.8in SLTank60 × 30cm24 × 12inTemp20–24°C68–75°FpH6.0–7.5Some individuals do appear very similar to G. farragus, with noticeable spotting on the head, but can usually still be told apart by examining the caudal-fin which tends to contain only a single thick, dark vertical bar in G. farragus whereas in G. ocellatus there are more often two bars, one thick, one thinner. Intermediate forms do exist though meaning identification is sometimes tricky.

Gastromyzon scitulus
Tan & Leh, 2006
Max length45mm SL1.8in SLTank75 × 30cm30 × 12inTemp20–24°C68–75°FpH6.0–7.5It can be distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: gill slit angular; presence of subopercular groove, running continuous to origin of pectoral-fin; body black with numerous, small, evenly-spaced light brown spots; head dorsum black with numerous cream spots; pectoral and pelvic fins with cream spots; caudal-fin with iridescen...

Hemibagrus peguensis
Boulenger, 1894
Max length286mm SL11in SLTanknot recordedTempnot recordedpHnot recordedMembers of this assemblage can be told apart from other congeners by possession of 44–46 vertebrae, an adipose-fin with a relatively short base (< 20 % SL), a colour pattern comprising either distinct black spots arranged in vertical columns or irregular black vertical lines running along the flanks, and normally a reddish or orangish caudal-fin in life.

Hemibarbus labeoBarbel Steed
Pallas, 1776
Max length450mm SL18in SLTanknot recordedTempnot recordedpHnot recordedThis species can be distinguished from other members of the genus by the following combination of characters: absence of dark spots on body in adults; body elongate with slightly convex dorsal profile; head longer than body is deep; snout much longer than postorbital head length; lips well developed, lateral lobes of lower lip broad and thick with folds, median process small; barbel thickness shorter or equal to eye diameter; dorsal spine strong, ⅔ of HL; dorsal-fin origin closer to tip of snout than caudal-fin base base; 15+ gill rakers; 6½ branched anal-fin rays; posterior simple dorsal-fin rays ossified and spinous.
Homalopterula ripleyi
Fowler, 1940
Max length59mm SL2.3in SLTank80 × 30cm31 × 12inTemp20–25.5°C68–78°FpH6.0–7.5Fowler (1940) described this species as the unique member of his new genus Homalopterula on the basis of a single specimen, separated from related genera by the curved shape of the jaws, truncate caudal-fin and scaleless ventral surface.

Hypancistrus inspectorL102
Armbruster, 2002
Max length160mm SL6in SLTank120 × 45cm48 × 18inTemp22–30°C72–86°FpH5.0–7.5H. inspector can be told apart from other described species in the genus by the following combination of characters: colour pattern comprising brown to black base with large whitish to yellow spots; adpressed dorsal-fin not reaching the adipose-fin spine; spots on head much smaller than on rest of body; spots in the upper caudal-fin lobe combining to form bands in adults; 24 plates in the mid-ventral series.

Hyphessobrycon compressusMayan Tetra
Meek, 1904
Max length45mm SL1.8in SLTanknot recordedTemp20–26°C68–79°FpH6.5–8.0H. compressus is the type species of the genus Hyphessobrycon but is not well-known in the ornamental trade. Hyphessobrycon was raised by Durbin in Eigenmann (1908) as a subgenus of Hemigrammus, differing from the latter by the absence of scales on the caudal-fin.

Iksookimia yongdokensis
Kim & Park, 1997
Max length160mm SL6in SLTank100 × 30cm39 × 12inTemp20–24°C68–75°FpH7.0–8.0Among them it's most similar to I. longicorpus and I. hugowolfeldi but can be distinguished by the following combination of characters: body patterning consisting of 9-13 dark vertical bars along the flanks plus a small dark spot at the base of the upper caudal-fin lobe; no black blotch or markings posterior to the operculum; reduced lamina circularis in males; interorbital width measures 14.7-17.8% o...

Jinshaia sinensis
Sauvage & Dabry de Thiersant, 1874
Max length75mm SL3.0in SLTank90 × 30cm36 × 12inTemp20–24°C68–75°FpH6.0–7.5This species may not yet have been seen in the aquarium trade outside its native country but has been maintained by a few private collectors. There are currently three species recognised in the genus, all endemic to the Yangtze river drainage, and they're separated from other balitorids by a combination of characters including: relatively long, deeply-forked caudal-fin; roun...

Labeo angra
Hamilton, 1822
Max length200mm SL8in SLTanknot recordedTempnot recordedpHnot recordedThis species can be identified by colour pattern comprising a brownish dorsal surface, yellowish flanks and abdomen, and a black to bluish lateral stripe extending from the eye to the caudal-fin base.

Labeo pierrei
Sauvage, 1880
Max length800mm SL31in SLTanknot recordedTempnot recordedpHnot recordedThis species can be distinguished by the following characters: juveniles with brown body and dark marking at base of caudal-fin; 37-42 + 3-4 lateral line scales; 11½ branched dorsal-fin rays; 7½ scale rows between lateral line and dorsal-fin origin; 20-25 predorsal scales; dorsal-fin relatively small with anterior branched rays shorter than head in juveniles, slightly longer than head in adults.

Laetacara thayeri
Steindachner, 1875
Max length65mm SL2.6in SLTanknot recordedTemp20–28°C68–82°FpH4.5–7.5This species is relatively rare in the aquarium trade. It can be differentiated from all congeners by a combination of possessing ctenoid (vs. cycloid) scales on the sides of the head plus lacking a dark spot at the caudal-fin base.

Lepidocephalichthys guntea
Hamilton, 1822
Max length150mm SL6in SLTank80 × 30cm31 × 12inTemp20–25°C68–77°FpH6.0–8.0This is one of the most frequently-traded members of the group and is an excellent choice for those new to keeping loaches. It's distinguishable from congeners by a combination of characters including: rounded/truncate caudal-fin; a scaleless patch on top of the head; relatively large adult size; flanks with spotted patterning in females and a solid...

Lepidocephalichthys micropogon
Blyth, 1860
Max length55mm SL2.2in SLTank60 × 30cm24 × 12inTemp20–25°C68–77°FpH6.0–7.5According to Kottelat (2012) L. manipurensis Arunkumar, 2000, which was described from Moreh, Manipur state, northeastern India, close to the border with Myanmar, is a syonym of L. micropogon. Havird and Page (2010) differentiate the two based on caudal-fin patterning, predorsal length and ver...

Lepidocephalichthys thermalis
Valenciennes, 1846
Max length50mm SL2.0in SLTank45 × 30cm18 × 12inTemp20–25°C68–77°FpH6.0–8.0This species is available sporadically and makes an excellent choice for those new to keeping loaches. It's distinguishable from congeners by a combination of characters including: truncate/rounded caudal-fin; no scales on top of head; dark, squarish spots o...

Macropodus ocellatusRoundtail Paradise Fish
Cantor, 1842
Max length80mm SL3.1in SLTank80 × 30cm31 × 12inTemp10–22°C50–72°FpH6.0–7.5M. ocellatus can be distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: caudal-fin rounded; eye stripe not connecting spot on posterior projection of opercle with eye; dorsal-fin rays filamentous posterior to a vertical through the posterior anal-fin rays in adults; 16-19 spinous dorsal-fin rays; 6-13 rakers on ceratobranchial of first gill arch; posterior tip or margin of body scales not darker than scales.

Megalechis pictaBar-tailed Hoplo
Müller & Troschel, 1849
Max length120mm SL5in SLTank120 × 45cm48 × 18inTemp18–28°C64–82°FpH5.0–7.5This species was previously referred to as M. thoracata, but that name is now applied to the species with a relatively short dorsal-fin spine which was formerly known as M. personata. M. picta can be told apart from M. thoracata by presence of a dark vertical bar in the caudal-fin, a comparatively longer dorsal-fin spine (52.0-64.0% vs. 32.0-48.0% of dorsal-fin base in specimens measur...

Mystacoleucus atridorsalis
Fowler, 1937
Max length80mm SL3.1in SLTanknot recordedTempnot recordedpHnot recordedThis species can be distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: body depth fits 2.5-2.7 times in SL; 28-31 +2-3 lateral line scales; 14-16 circumpeduncular scale rows; 5-5½ scale rows between the lateral line and dorsal-fin origin; a triangular distal blotch on the dorsal-fin; a few body scales with crescent-shaped black edges; a thin dark margin on the dorsal-fin, posterior to the distal blotch; a dark posterior margin on the caudal-fin; normally a single pair of rudimentary barbels present.

Opsarius barna
Hamilton, 1822
Max length130mm SL5in SLTank150 × 60cm60 × 24inTemp16–24°C61–75°FpH6.0–8.0This species occasionally appears in the ornamental trade, usually as 'striped hill trout' or 'banded hill trout'. It can be distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: lateral line complete with 40-42 scales; barbels absent; 10-13 anal-fin rays; body with 9-11 dark blue vertical bars; last dorsal-fin ray extending to caudal-fin base.